🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty designed to protect females from violence, including family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to approve or reject the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, requiring governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional consideration if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in several EU countries
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for survivors of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in additional member states