How Secret Filming Exposed a £28 Million Holiday Ownership Scam
Authorities have called it as one of the largest frauds of its type in the UK.
A total of 14 defendants have been convicted for their part in a £28m conspiracy to cheat in excess of 3,500 holiday ownership investors.
The affected individuals were eager to exit age-old holiday ownership agreements and went looking for help.
Most were from 60 and 80. Over 500 of them lost more than £10,000, and one individual paid more than £80,000.
Those affected were exposed to high-pressure consultations continuing for six hours. They were left out of pocket, holding worthless fake "rewards" and remained bound by expensive timeshare contracts they frequently were unable to use.
The Firm Central to the Deception
The company at the heart of the scheme was the timeshare resale company. They took customers' funds to finance the proprietors' lavish standard of living of prestigious schooling, luxury homes and personal aircraft.
The leader at the head of the company, the company director, was given a seven-and-half year prison term in January for deceptive scheme.
On Friday, his partner one of the co-defendants was among the last group to learn their fate.
She received a two-year deferred imprisonment at the London court after admitting illegal fund handling.
It has been a long time coming and marks a huge win for the people who spoke out, the police and legal representatives.
How the Inquiry Started
I first heard about the firm was in the summer of 2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a broadcasting service, producing current affairs features.
A acquaintance pointed out that his mother had inherited the ownership of a holiday property in the Spanish coast and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to get out of the contract.
It's worth mentioning how common vacation properties had grown with English tourists in the eighties and nineties.
Holiday ownership enabled families to occupy the equivalent unit annually, or exchange their weeks with additional holders who had units in other resorts. About 600,000 holiday enthusiasts accepted that option.
The first timeshare rush was accompanied by a numerous accounts about dishonest operators mis-selling investments. They appeared frequently on public interest shows.
The typical vacation property deal tied investors in for long periods.
At that time, those owners who had enjoyed their assigned property in the resort for decades were getting older, and a significant number were looking to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.
Some had declining mobility and couldn't get to their properties. Others just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had deceased, in many cases bequeathing their family members to take over the contracts - along with their regular contributions and service charges.
The Undercover Operation Develops
This was the situation the family member had ended up. She searched the web for answers and found SMT, a business whose online presence claimed to terminate her deal.
Yet, having made a payment and scheduled a consultation with them, her loved ones smelled a rat.
Further research uncovered hundreds of people saying they had paid money and received no benefit out of it. Indeed, they had suffered financially. Significant sums.
The investigative unit started looking into what was going on. It soon emerged that there were dubious individuals working within the holiday ownership market.
A legal professional had numerous client reports waiting to sue the organization.
The team interviewed people who had dealt with the organization and they all told the same story. They believed the company would buy their property from them but when they went to a consultation (for which they paid up front) they were informed there was no market for their property.
In place of that, they were pushed - indeed compelled - to invest additional funds investing in "the company's points system", named after the business's umbrella group, Monster Travel.
The nature of these rewards was somewhat vague. They seemed similar to a form of credit, providing cheaper vacations and services and consumer discounts.
And they were apparently "tradable" with other owners, at a future date.
Investing money immediately would result in an long-term benefit that would offset the firm's costs and result in the timeshare holder in profit, freed at last from their pesky deal.
An unbelievable offer? Certainly, that proved correct.
A 'Misleading Scam'
Assuming these reports were correct, this was a major deception.
The technique is termed a "deceptive marketing."
Someone - here the company - "lures the consumer by advertising a defined offering and then say that's not available, pushing the client in the direction of an alternative, lesser offering.
This is against the law. Armed with all the testimony we had collected, we presented the rationale to covertly record one of the firm's consultations.
Such an operation demands dedication, work, and compelling reasons for why this is the exclusive approach to obtain the evidence required to prove wrongdoing.
With approval secured, our compact group set up a consultation with one of the firm's agents in the location.
Pretending to be a potential client hoping to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement